Cambrian Complaining part 2
Just a brief note to link an illustration of exactly how variable the age correlations for the Cambrian have been over the past 80 years.
http://earth-time.org/evolving_timescale.gif
I'm a geochemist. In the past ten years I've fixed mass spectrometers, blasted sapphires with a laser beam, explored for uranium in a nature reserve, and measured growth patterns in fish ears, and helped design the next generation of the world's most advanced ion probe. My main interest is in-situ mass spectrometry, but I have a soft spot in my heart for thermodynamics, drillers, and cosmochemistry.
Just a brief note to link an illustration of exactly how variable the age correlations for the Cambrian have been over the past 80 years.
http://earth-time.org/evolving_timescale.gif
Posted by
Chuck
at
6:54 PM
3 comments:
Nice! If only it crammed on the details of when the ages changed, vs. when they picked new fossil-appearances to define the eras...
Interesting. I had no idea these dates were so fluid through time.... I now resent our sed/strat guy making us memorize dates even more!
If you're really curious, check out the papers. I suspect that the main problem is correlating the strata. The Neoproterozoic is notorious for not having any ash layers where you need them; I suspect the same was true of the Cambrian for a while. On the other hand, the Cryogenean confusion is what keeps my paychecks coming; if it was easy, I wouldn't be able to keep getting paid for shovelling zircons into the mass spectrometers.
Post a Comment